Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 11:57:12 James Le Cuirot <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:13:32 +0200 > Pacho Ramos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > <app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-jna-20140508-r1 > > > > Why do we need to keep app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-jna-20140508-r1 to > > simply end up rdepending on > > >=virtual/libffi-3.0.13-r1[abi_x86_32(-)] ? Also, no package in the > > >tree rdepends on this emul set and, then, > > packages outside portage could simply rdepend on libffi directly > > instead of needing to keep this > > Michał, as already discussed with Pacho [1], emul-linux-x86-jna can just > go away entirely. Nothing requires it and it doesn't make any sense > without emul-linux-x86-java though I note that isn't in the list either; > I thought it would be. Java herd is struggling with the regular VM > packages enough as it is, we could really do without supporting this > one as well. I very much doubt that end users need it any more. Any > objections to removing it? > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474464#c5 I don't really want to touch Java stuff, so I'd prefer if you handled that yourself. That said, feel free to add it to the same p.mask entry. Just make sure not to break the dependency graph :). -- Best regards, Michał Górny
pgpcg6iJ6xE0A.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
