2015-05-03 13:19 GMT+03:00 Maxim Koltsov <maksbo...@gentoo.org>: > Well, I can see your point. But I don't see any reasonable alternative --- > this functionality can't be generalized by any name, except "c++14" --- > that's only thing in common. >
Yes, exactly. > Moreover, this is (I hope) a _temporal_ solution, until there's a gcc with > needed level of support. > I have increasing concerns about that. The relevant bugreport ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60177 ) is more than a year old, and still no feedback on it from gcc guys. Moreover, this bug is hardly related to C++11/14 — it's pure 03. I could live with some kludges in C++11, but they became incompatible with some of C++14. -- Georg Rudoy
