El mar, 28-04-2015 a las 11:07 +0200, Tobias Klausmann escribió:
[...]
> There is one corner case where that format is not enough:
> multiple ebuilds/versions with non-homogenic archs, i.e.:
>
> cat-egory/packageA-1.2.3 amd64 x86 alpha
> cat-egory/packageB-2.3.9 amd64 alpha
> cat-egory/packageC-3.99 amd64 x86 ppc64
> cat-egory/packageD-10.2.5a alpha
>
> The format I used here seemes to be slightly more common than
> others and it is good enough for me™.
>
> Any add-on prose should be _after_ the standardized bit.
>
Yeah, we also use that format for gnome stuff... anyway, I don't mind
having a different option -> provide "list-${arch}" attachments with the
concrete lists per arch :/
Any preference?
