On 8/2/15 7:27 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > What would be really clean is USE='qt qt5' (or 'qt qt4'), alike GNOME > team policy. USE=qt would mean 'any version of Qt, if optional', and > qt4/qt5 would be used to switch between Qt4/Qt5. If Qt would be > obligatory, no USE=qt would apply. If only one Qt version would be > supported, no USE=qt4/qt5 would apply. Clean, sane and limited > package.use cruft.
+1 > However, as you can see QA has previously outvoted the clean policy for > USE=gtk. I don't see why it would decide otherwise for USE=qt*. I wonder what was the reasoning for the QA decision you refer to. Do you have more details or archive references? FWIW I think decisions like that can be revisited. Now could be a good moment for that. Paweł
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
