On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>>>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that >>>>> parse commit messages. >>>> >>>> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all >>>> purposes, even for tools. >>> >>> I'm pretty sure the majority of developers don't care that one developer >>> uses "X-Gentoo-Bug" and another just adds it to the commit title. >>> >>> I like /guidelines/ in the sense that, if I don't know something, I can look >>> it up. But don't make it mandatory until we start depending on it (for >>> instance, when we would automate stuff based on the content of the commit >>> message). >> >> I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it was >> for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in >> style. >> > > I'd be fine with that and add a reference to the kernel guideline [0] to > the wiki as well, so that it is clear that we also allow/use Acked-by, > Reviewed-by, Suggested-by and whatnot. > > I'll wait for more ++ though.
I like Gentoo-Bug. Much nicer without the X-.
