On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>>>>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that >>>>>> parse commit messages. >>>>> >>>>> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all >>>>> purposes, even for tools. >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure the majority of developers don't care that one developer >>>> uses "X-Gentoo-Bug" and another just adds it to the commit title. >>>> >>>> I like /guidelines/ in the sense that, if I don't know something, I can >>>> look >>>> it up. But don't make it mandatory until we start depending on it (for >>>> instance, when we would automate stuff based on the content of the commit >>>> message). >>> >>> I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it was >>> for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in >>> style. >>> >> >> I'd be fine with that and add a reference to the kernel guideline [0] to >> the wiki as well, so that it is clear that we also allow/use Acked-by, >> Reviewed-by, Suggested-by and whatnot. >> >> I'll wait for more ++ though. > > I like Gentoo-Bug. Much nicer without the X-. >
+1 for Gentoo-Bug (or Gentoo-bug? not sure about the capitalization)
