On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is, however, worth repeating that in git, commits are entirely > separate from pushes and are very (as in, extremely!) cheap, while > pushes, particularly if properly repoman-checked, are obviously much more > expensive.
Each commit really should be able to stand on its own all the same. They should all be able to pass a repoman check. Otherwise when you do try to use tools like bisect you can get breakage. It is really frustrating when you're trying to track down a change that causes an issue and find a large stretch of commits that won't even build. -- Rich
