>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, William Hubbs wrote: > From what I've read, the traditional difference between bin and sbin > was that sbin means static-bin and everything stored in there was to > be able to come up without libraries.
Source/reference for this? > As mgorny was talking about earlier, a good chunk of what is in sbin > *can* be run by normal users. Then it shouldn't be in sbin, in the first place. That's a separate discussion though. Ulrich
pgpwngU3V2pmA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
