>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, William Hubbs wrote:

>> > From what I've read, the traditional difference between bin and sbin
>> > was that sbin means static-bin and everything stored in there was to
>> > be able to come up without libraries.
>> 
>> Source/reference for this?
 
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3519952

Hm, SunOS end of 1980s. Soon after (Solaris 2.0 ca. 1992) they
switched to the current meaning and had executables in /usr/sbin
"to be run only by system administrators":
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26505_01/html/816-5175/filesystem-5.html

Anyway, whatever the history is, I guess we should go with the current
FHS definition of sbin.

Ulrich

Attachment: pgpkEBQe21h0o.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to