2016-02-14 21:23 GMT+01:00 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org>: > On 14 Feb 2016 11:41, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:00:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just change > > > > the virtual back. One-line change. > > > > > > Which is precisely the corresponding argument for not switching the > > > default to eudev in the first place. > > > > OH, my, this is looking more like you are being paid by systemd peeps... > > honestly ? cut the crap man. > > > You are just refusing to acknowledge these simple facts. > > > > systemd.................: irrelevant to this decision > > > > standalone systemd-udev.: Vehemently unsupported, support for its > > capability to exist is planned to be punted > > in the future. > > > > eudev...................: fully functional, actively developed, > > and fully supported, mature project, been > > around for years. > > udev: it's the default in every major distro that everyone tests and > develops against. >
This is NOT true, major distro use systemd, NOT udev as we use it. > > eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it. > Neither this is totally true, or put another way, everybody which is NOT using systemd is using eudev (or some form of static /dev). So obviously this is totally relevant for people that don't use systemd. Also, why, why people using systemd ARE interested in this thread? You should not be interested at all. > > > Oh and here is one final piece that should blow your reason away > > > > https://github.com/gentoo/eudev <== NOTICE that it's upstream is > > within our gentoo domain. > > irrelevant. any Gentoo dev can create any repo in that namespace even > when they shouldn't. the fact that eudev is in there does *not* mean > the whole Gentoo project has signed on to it, or that it's some sort > of "banner" project. it means at least one Gentoo dev decided to do X > and our project system doesn't require project consensus before X can > proceed. do not conflate these. > -mike >
