> On Feb 17, 2016, at 9:01 AM, Ben Kohler <bkoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Richard Yao <r...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> eudev has every commit scrutinized by people who care about using it on 
>> Gentoo. systemd-udev does not. Consequently, eudev has avoided the system 
>> boot breaking regressions that prompted its creation. That is a good reason 
>> to make it the new default. If it fails to fulfill its duties, then this 
>> could be revisited, but that should be unlikely.
> I think if someone could enumerate those specific breakages and present it as 
> evidence, that could get more people on board for this change.  Moreso than 
> just "upstream doesn't care about us" or "eventually split udev will be 
> impossible".

That would require more time than I have to give right now. Hopefully someone 
else could go through the old bug reports and IRC logs to find those records.

> -Ben

Reply via email to