On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:52:24PM +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 +0000 (UTC) > > "Patrice Clement" <monsie...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > commit: 4f2477ca1ab07969bae57e7b47e8b7a5ba9a6050 > > > Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> > > > AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:35:31 2016 +0000 > > > Commit: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> > > > CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:58:13 2016 +0000 > > > URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4f2477ca > > ... > > > > - <description>CC on bugs</description> > > > > You're discarding important information here. This also has been > > covered in the GLEP. The suggested solution is to copy the person into > > downstream maintainers with appropriate explanatory description (like > > 'upstream developer wishing to be CC-ed on bugs'). > > Just an FYI: > Members of the Proxy Maintainers project decided that the inclusion of the > <description /> element was superfluous and that the ordering of <maintainer > /> > elements was sufficient for determining bug assignment/CC'ing based on the > bug-wranglers policy[0] (which does not explicitly mention <description />).
Forgot the reference (which I probably don't need anyway) but: 0: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Bug-wranglers#Assigning_bug_reports -- Sam Jorna GnuPG Key: D6180C26
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
