Dnia 20 kwietnia 2016 06:52:24 CEST, Sam Jorna <wra...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): >On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 +0000 (UTC) >> "Patrice Clement" <monsie...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> > commit: 4f2477ca1ab07969bae57e7b47e8b7a5ba9a6050 >> > Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> >> > AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:35:31 2016 +0000 >> > Commit: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> >> > CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:58:13 2016 +0000 >> > URL: >https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4f2477ca > >... > >> > - <description>CC on bugs</description> >> >> You're discarding important information here. This also has been >> covered in the GLEP. The suggested solution is to copy the person >into >> downstream maintainers with appropriate explanatory description (like >> 'upstream developer wishing to be CC-ed on bugs'). > >Just an FYI: >Members of the Proxy Maintainers project decided that the inclusion of >the ><description /> element was superfluous and that the ordering of ><maintainer /> >elements was sufficient for determining bug assignment/CC'ing based on >the >bug-wranglers policy[0] (which does not explicitly mention <description >/>).
Just FYI, we're talking about upstream maintainer elements which do not take part in bug assignment. -- Best regards, Michał Górny (by phone)
