On 05/04/2016 02:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Austin English wrote:
>> I've been working on the transition from #!/sbin/runscript to
>> #!/sbin/openrc-run [1], by starting on the maintainer-needed
>> packages. That's done (aside from some stabilizations needed, but
>> I'll deal with that latter). The trouble is that there are roughly
>> 700 packages that need to be updated, and that's an insane number of
>> bugs to file.
>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573846
> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Portage
> tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch any init
> scripts installed from elsewhere. You should look for the set of
> installed files instead.
How is that relevant here at all? I'm cleaning up portage installed init
scripts, what a user does outside of that is a separate problem (for the
init program, not gentoo.git).
 
> Also, what problem are you trying to solve? My guess would be that
> /sbin/runscript must be kept around indefinitely in any case, in order
> not to risk breakage on users' systems.
>
> Ulrich
Again, not my issue. I'm trying to prevent the problem from spreading
further. If only new scripts get openrc-run, the runscript shebang
should be rare in a year now, for example. But again, that's for OpenRC
to decide. That's not reason not to get away from the deprecated name now.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to