On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:42:14 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > > > > Also there's some debate in IRC about whether or not these packages > > should be lastrited or dropped to maintainer-needed. These forks are > > not in good shape upstream, so I think it makes better sense to > > p.mask/lastrite and then move them to the graveyard overlay when I > > remove them from the tree in 30 days. > > > > IMO the criteria should be whether they work or not. Not whether > upstream is more or less active. > > If they're blockers on other work, by all means cull them. However, > if the biggest problem with them is that they're using a few inodes in > the repo, then they should probably stay. +1
Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpTATvMiWKjx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
