On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:09:04PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:01:58 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 08:10:07AM -0500, james wrote: > > > On 07/08/2016 05:17 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:30:36 -0400 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > > > >> > > > >> I emailed the list some time ago about giving away a bunch of bitcoin > > > >> forks to see if anyone was interested in taking them. I didn't get any > > > >> feedback so as of tomorrow I'll be masking the following for removal in > > > >> 30 days. > > > > > > > > Any reason for mask and removal? Are these packages broken? > > > > Just drop them to maintainer-needed. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Andrew Savchenko > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps we should start posting these orphaned-package announcements to > > > gentoo-user, so folks interested in learning about ebuilds can ponder > > > proxy-maintenance of a few packages as an opportunity? > > > > I'm not sure that's necessary, that's what g-d-a is for. > > How many users are subscribed to the gentoo-dev-announce ML? The > very name suggests that this is development announce, not something > related to our users. > > We already duplicate Last-rites messages to gentoo-dev ML, why not > add gentoo-user here too? Why do we need to duplicate Last-rites on > gentoo-dev in the first place? I suppose there are two reasons: > > 1) even not all devs are subscribed to gentoo-dev-announce;
They should be, the last I heard this list is mandatory for all devs. > 2) this is a moderated list, which creates some delays. This might be a consideration, but I'm not sure. I'm not really for adding another list we cross-post last rites announcements to, I would rather encourage folks who want to keep track of that to subscribe to g-d-a. That's also where the announcements for council meetings go, etc. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
