On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:21:16 +0200
Alexis Ballier <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
> Rich Freeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build
> > with gold it completely achieves the goal, and it will actually result
> > in fewer bugs using the non-gold linker as well.  
> 
> That's what a tinderbox is for. The only QA problem I see here is that
> QA doesn't automate that kind of checks anymore since Diego left. Maybe
> QA should ask Toralf to run a ld.gold tinderbox and avoid asking people
> to randomly test random packages ?

Yes, tinderboxing makes a lot of sense if the bugs are afterwards
ignored by package maintainers. Or in the best case, the maintainer
tells reporter (Toralf) to file the bug upstream.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Attachment: pgpk3uzO9JfPO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to