On December 25, 2016 9:49:02 PM GMT+09:00, Kent Fredric <ken...@gentoo.org> wrote: >On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:41:29 +0100 >Agostino Sarubbo <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> NOTE: I'm intending this message as a sort of announcement to invite >everyone >> to port their stable requests. I guess there isn't much to discuss >here. If >> you don't like some of the changes that have been done, please open a >specific >> thread about. >> >> Thanks. > >A quick rundown on attaching stabilization lists as files might be >helpful, >especially in regards to that flag having three states, the "undefined" >state (ie: no such flag) >, and both "-" and "+" states. >
It is not necessary to use a file now. Just put the list in the "Atoms to stabilize" as described. >Also steps to take in regards to getting a "Flags: sanitycheck-" report >should be clarified. > >( I assume these will all be in the wiki, I'm just jotting them here >under the >presumption that the content of this email and its replies will be used >as a baseline >for the wiki ) Not an expert and Michael can clarify, but sanity check basically means repoman does not check out. That is, the developer did not provide a proper stable list or target and potentially breaks the stable tree. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
