On 22/05/17 05:12, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: >> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: >>> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially >>> since they >>> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev >>> maintainer in >>> metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything >>> else. >> >> Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be >> added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo >> developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s) >> without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There >> are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few >> for which you are one of the maintainers. >> > That's nice. > > Could proxy-maint as a team maybe try to agree on such things so that > everyone is on the same page? It's a tiny bit annoying when the > actions of some contradict the suggested rules of others, while > appearing as a single team to the outside ... > > > You imply some level of organisation, and yet this /is/ Gentoo we're talking about ....
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
