On pon, 2017-05-29 at 20:24 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > For a long time we seem to be missing appropriate tools to handle USE > > flag constraints efficiently. EAPI 4 brought REQUIRED_USE but all > > things considered, it has proven to be far from an optimal solution. > > I would therefore like to discuss adding a better tool to amend or > > replace it, to allow for automated handling of USE flag constraints. > > REQUIRED_USE's problems all come from it being thrown in at the last > minute without any testing of either the user experience or the > feasibility of its implementation. Have you implemented a prototype to > show that you can actually fix those problems? >
I tend to RFC before starting the implementation. Saves effort. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
