-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

unpopular, unwanted opinion:

just have users of a *source based distro* where the emphasis is
*choice* actually choose what they want?

What is the big deal with the way REQUIRED_USE works now?  "Users have
to do something".  You always have to do something when you run
source-based distros.  If they don't want to do something, don't run a
distro that is source-based.  Gentoo being about choice necessitates
knowledge about the choices you make before you make them.  It will
never be truly "user friendly" for the noob set.  And that's fine, and
that's where "friendly" forks like Sabayon and CoreOS and Adélie come in
.

I don't really want to see Portage's code base bloated with even
another solver that is poorly defined (and worse, this one would make
it in to PMS) just because users want to be lazy and Gentoo devs want
to enable laziness.

For the SSL/provider thing, I suggest just doing a DEPEND=ssl? (
virtual/ssl ) where that is provided by openssl or libressl.  If a
package doesn't support both, just DEPEND=ssl? ( whichever one it does
support ).  [I actually suggested this some time ago, but was ignored
there, too.]

But hey, I'm not a Gentoo dev, so I really don't have a voice here. :)

- --arw

- -- 
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
http://adelielinux.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Rxfe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to