On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:41:53 -0500 "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:42:59 -0600 > Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > You seem to know a bit about this, has there been a bug made > > outlining the troubles we will encounter as you know them? > > No A user did file a bug for Java 9. Which the response they received from Gentoo discouraged them and they closed it. Nice!!!! https://bugs.gentoo.org/634698 IMHO no way to respond to a user. Their reaction is the exact reason why. When others showed in #gentoo-java asking about 9. I first stated I guess no one cares since no bug has been filed. To my surprise one was, and it was closed due a rude response from Gentoo. They could have not commented at all.... Bug would have remained open. Doubt that users will return... Much less help out etc. My response and attitude is because the only reason Java 9 was not in tree zero day release, is because of Gentoo itself. https://bugs.gentoo.org/634698#c5 I would have had it in log ago and maintained since. Much less discover all the issues I am now and fixing them in tree vs overlay. Dec 5, 2016 https://github.com/Obsidian-StudiosInc/os-xtoo/commit/f90d8b21c39dbe8684e0951b845c43fae2ba6cfc#diff-0ecef02a46ed32d29b482614d71d229f https://github.com/Obsidian-StudiosInc/os-xtoo/commits/master/dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin Go GENTOO! -- William L. Thomson Jr.
pgp7CKzVK3m2k.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
