Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 23:37:48 CET schrieb R0b0t1: > Hello, > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank <holgers...@posteo.de> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one > > specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing > > moderator rules, I would like to propose the following ruleset for > > gentoo-dev > > > > Right now the situation escalated in a way that forces to actually do > > something and I hope we can recreate an atmosphere where technical > > improvements can happen. > > To me, at least, this isn't self-evident. What specific actions make > you think an immediate response is necessary? > > self-evident > adj. Evident to one’s self and to nobody else. > > Cheers, > R0b0t1 There is a specific RFC about splitting the mailing list because of a problematic style of conversation.
Even if that split won’t happen -- I don’t know if mgorny has the "right" or support to do that and I personally want to stay out of these discussions -- I really *do* think that a moderation of a frequented mailing list like gentoo- dev is a generally good idea. Therefore we need properly documented rules (beside moderators). To answer you question: I think the RFC introduces either a "time pressure" or should be seen as sign that this list needs an improvement. Regards, Nils -- GPG fingerprint: '766B 8122 1342 6912 3401 492A 8B54 D7A3 FF3C DB17' Holgersson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
