On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I disagree. I think most of the developers are used to the lexical sort, > and it keeps the order predictable. While I suppose keeping amd64 > and x86 alongside for the sake of being commonly used would make sense, > I really have no clue how that would affect other arches. > It is a trade-off, of course. My hypothesis is that it would be easier to use. > By 'frequency' did you mean how many ebuilds are having the specific > keyword? Could you make some quick stats that would show how this would > look like right now? > Here's an estimation of the relative frequencies: amd64 (37201) x86 (33703) ppc (15347) arm (14387) ppc64 (11647) sparc (10054) alpha (9219) ia64 (8456) hppa (8410) arm64 (8194) amd64-linux (7716) mips (7602) x86-linux (7409) x86-fbsd (6102) sh (4885) s390 (4421) ppc-macos (4098) x86-macos (4028) amd64-fbsd (3361) x86-solaris (3202) x64-macos (3187) sparc-solaris (2464) x64-solaris (2208) m68k (2204) sparc64-solaris (1344) arm-linux (1135) ppc-aix (971) sparc-fbsd (902) m68k-mint (626) x64-cygwin (432) x86-winnt (123) x86-interix (5) x86-cygwin (5) ia64-hpux (5) ppc64-linux (4) arm64-linux (4) x86-freebsd (1) Regards, Dirkjan
