W dniu wto, 23.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶44 +0100, użytkownik Thomas Deutschmann napisał: > Hi, > > On 2018-01-23 12:46, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look: > > > > > > https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html > > > > > > > I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by Dirkjan. > > All arches are order according to the popularity (based on the results > > from his mail), except Prefix which I left at the bottom as a special > > case. > > grobian's variant doesn't work for me: > > When I start stabilization (especially for security bugs) I check > existing keywords via "ekeywords". For many packages I can select > "ALPHA" and scroll down to "Unstable arches", i.e. press and hold SHIFT > key and click "X86". Very easy. Grobian's variant would require to > deselect arm64 for example.
If arm64 has stable keywords, you are expected to stabilize for it as well. > > djc's variant is better than grobian's variant, however I prefer a label > item like current "Unstable arches" which makes it easy for me to spot > the end of the typical list. > > In mgorny's variant I don't understand the differentiation between "exp" > and "~arch". I won't split them to be honest. 'exp' are arches you are supposed to stabilize for but there are not first tier. '~arch' are arches you never stabilize for. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
