>>>>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, Michał Górny wrote: >> > This specification currently defines one section: ``[structure]``. >> > This section defines one or more repository structure definitions >> > using sequential integer keys. The definition keyed as ``0`` >> > is the most preferred structure. The package manager should use >> > the first structure format it recognizes as supported, and ignore any >> > it does not recognize. If this section is not present, the package >> > manager should behave as if only ``flat`` structure were supported. >> >> It is not at all clear from this how integer keys are ordered. The >> paragraph only says that "0" is most preferred, but says nothing about >> comparison of other numbers. >> >> For example, if there are keys "-1", "0", and "1" (these are >> "sequential integer keys", right?), what is their order of preference?
> Please suggest a better wording. The idea was to use 0=, 1=, 2=... "... using non-negative integer keys. The definition with the smallest key is the most preferred structure. The package manager should ignore any formats it does not recognize." Ulrich
pgpyiniE0j7qi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
