W dniu nie, 28.01.2018 o godzinie 11∶14 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > > This specification currently defines one section: ``[structure]``. > > This section defines one or more repository structure definitions > > using sequential integer keys. The definition keyed as ``0`` > > is the most preferred structure. The package manager should use > > the first structure format it recognizes as supported, and ignore any > > it does not recognize. If this section is not present, the package > > manager should behave as if only ``flat`` structure were supported. > > It is not at all clear from this how integer keys are ordered. The > paragraph only says that "0" is most preferred, but says nothing about > comparison of other numbers. > > For example, if there are keys "-1", "0", and "1" (these are > "sequential integer keys", right?), what is their order of preference? >
Please suggest a better wording. The idea was to use 0=, 1=, 2=... -- Best regards, Michał Górny
