On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 23:13 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:00:24 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 11:46 +0000, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > > commit: d866d4705e1e4a092579a31df2815e3407950a19 > > > Author: Jeroen Roovers <jer <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> > > > AuthorDate: Mon Oct 1 11:45:43 2018 +0000 > > > Commit: Jeroen Roovers <jer <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> > > > CommitDate: Mon Oct 1 11:46:10 2018 +0000 > > > URL: > > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d866d470 > > > > > > net-libs/libssh2: Add USE=mbedtls, switch to cmake for building > > > > > > * Add support for net-libs/mbedtls > > > * Switch to cmake as the autotools build is even more broken > > > * Remove USE=static-libs as that inhibits building shared libs > > > * Use REQUIRED_USE to force choosing a crypto backend > > You completely skipped over the improvements. In effect, you show > yourself to be completely unresponsive to what were considered positive > changes to the author of the work. > > Then you begin to pick apart what you think is wrong. It's not obvious > why you are doing it this way, and with regard to practically all > of your earlier e-mails addressed to me, I can only assume malice.
I'm sorry but I'm not going to help you if you keep attacking me like this. I have merely pointed out mistakes I've noticed. I did it privately specifically with respect to you. You turn this into some kind of public slandering effort, apparently for no other reason than 'assuming malice'. I'm sorry if you can't see anything good in people. When someone points out an issue with my ebuild, I assume he just wants to have the ebuild improved. But now I learn people do that out of sheer malice. I'm sorry that my comments were not detailed enough. I have wrongly assumed they'd point you in the right direction, and you'd be able to solve those issues with help of eclass documentation. > Someone suggested in an e-mail that "he is just annoyed that you broke > an ebuild that he has spent some time maintaining", but `git shortlog > -- .` would tell you quite a different story. What I think is happening > here is that you think I am "touching your stuff". You have to nitpick > at it instead of just fixing it together and then sending me an update > about the extra work or by pointing out the problems in a more humane > way and leaving me to fix them. That's one way to look at it. The other way is that you're so horribly abrasive that I'm *scared* to touch this ebuild beyond what needs to be absolutely done. That's why I didn't switch it to CMake earlier -- because I presumed you'd attack me again. It seems I wasn't wrong after all. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
