On 8/15/19 3:19 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > I don't think that's a sane situation, so maybe the eclass should just > die here? (Basically, there are two possibilities: Either, things will > break if the dir is missing, then dying might be the best option. > Or, everything works without the dir, then the ebuild should set it to > /dev/null, in the first place.) >
That's my feeling as well. In 100% of cases so far, this has been a useful QA tool. Can we wait until that's not the case to change it?
