Hi, On 2019/08/15 16:47, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:33 AM Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 8/15/19 3:19 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> I don't think that's a sane situation, so maybe the eclass should just >>> die here? (Basically, there are two possibilities: Either, things will >>> break if the dir is missing, then dying might be the best option. >>> Or, everything works without the dir, then the ebuild should set it to >>> /dev/null, in the first place.) >>> >> That's my feeling as well. In 100% of cases so far, this has been a >> useful QA tool. Can we wait until that's not the case to change it? > I think an explicit die with a useful error message for the user would > be better than the status-quo. I agree. Kind Regards, Jaco
