On 2019/08/15 16:47, Mike Gilbert wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:33 AM Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 8/15/19 3:19 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> I don't think that's a sane situation, so maybe the eclass should just
>>> die here? (Basically, there are two possibilities: Either, things will
>>> break if the dir is missing, then dying might be the best option.
>>> Or, everything works without the dir, then the ebuild should set it to
>>> /dev/null, in the first place.)
>> That's my feeling as well. In 100% of cases so far, this has been a
>> useful QA tool. Can we wait until that's not the case to change it?
> I think an explicit die with a useful error message for the user would
> be better than the status-quo.

I agree.

Kind Regards,

Reply via email to