On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:46:15 +0100 "Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" <cont...@hacktivis.me> wrote:
> Wouldn't a Erlang project be better, specially as there is the Perl and > Python projects which are there for probably the same reasons? I think a "jabber" project would be a more suitable fit for this than "erlang". Then perhaps there can be a subproject of "jabber" for "ejabberd". "erlang" is probably too broad in scope. If there was an erlang project, then it might be sensible to have "ejabberd" be co-maintained by erlang.
pgpoq7L1O9uTb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
