On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 11:35:49 +0000 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <gen...@veremit.xyz> wrote:
> Note: we're nnot acttually talking about replacing portage here, just > creating a tool ((((thiink php script web tthingy)) that will do some of > the pre-screeninng worrrrk that AT hate (eg.... what kensiington did with > stable-bbot) > > * with apologies for keyboard/remote-access lagggg creating typo hell. But, doing that requires viewing realised copies of ebuilds, which requires interpreting eclasses and variable interpolation, which requires bash sourcing, which requires a mountain of portage hell. Yes, sharing the stable-bot logic would probably be fine. But it doesn't use a database AFAIK, it would likely just be making use of the MD5Cache (either directly, or indirectly via portage APIs) But I won't be volunteering, because I won't touch python.
pgphawvJwBwAU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
