On 1/20/20 1:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> I'm going to be blunt. We arbitrarily made a decision that /home
> belongs to sysadmin. Please respect that. If you really believe your
> package is *this* special to justify changing this arbitrary decision,
> the burden of proof lies on you.
>
Ok. How to move forward?
The old user.eclass allowed using /home, and we have packages using
/home. One of them is spamd, and I've beaten to death the reasons why I
think that's the best choice. I would rather not move it somewhere
*less* appropriate on principle. I would also like to not break running
mail systems the second the acct-user package is emerged.
What are the options?
* Upgrade to GLEP81 anyway and ignore the warning (my interim plan).
* Hack the acct-user ebuild so that it doesn't trigger the warning, by
bypassing $D.
* Leave it on user.eclass.
* ???
