On 1/20/20 1:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I'm going to be blunt. We arbitrarily made a decision that /home > belongs to sysadmin. Please respect that. If you really believe your > package is *this* special to justify changing this arbitrary decision, > the burden of proof lies on you. >
Ok. How to move forward? The old user.eclass allowed using /home, and we have packages using /home. One of them is spamd, and I've beaten to death the reasons why I think that's the best choice. I would rather not move it somewhere *less* appropriate on principle. I would also like to not break running mail systems the second the acct-user package is emerged. What are the options? * Upgrade to GLEP81 anyway and ignore the warning (my interim plan). * Hack the acct-user ebuild so that it doesn't trigger the warning, by bypassing $D. * Leave it on user.eclass. * ???