Il giorno lun 10 feb 2020 alle ore 08:20 Michał Górny <>
ha scritto:

> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:51 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > In that case, I suppose we'll have to apply consistency manually? Can we
> > all agree on a global order of preference for the relevant packages?
> That would be my idea, yes.  I'd suggest going for the 'lightest'
> package first.  Would you be able to figure out some kind of measure
> on how heavy each of those packages is?  I suppose we need to account
> for build time and dependencies.
> All of these packages are pretty old and not receiving commits in years,
may I suggest that the order should be from the less prone to break to the
most prone to break?
I'll leave to maintainers decide on how to assign a vote on resilience, but
monitoring upstream, active forks and other distro should be taken in


Reply via email to