On 2/11/20 12:32 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > > Il giorno lun 10 feb 2020 alle ore 08:20 Michał Górny > <mgo...@gentoo.org <mailto:mgo...@gentoo.org>> ha scritto: > > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:51 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > > In that case, I suppose we'll have to apply consistency > manually? Can we > > all agree on a global order of preference for the relevant packages? > > That would be my idea, yes. I'd suggest going for the 'lightest' > package first. Would you be able to figure out some kind of measure > on how heavy each of those packages is? I suppose we need to account > for build time and dependencies. > > All of these packages are pretty old and not receiving commits in > years, may I suggest that the order should be from the less prone to > break to the most prone to break?
How do you determine this? > I'll leave to maintainers decide on how to assign a vote on resilience, Ah. So no. Whats wrong with simply sorting by alphabetic order? Elinks seems a fine default for those who don't care enough to change it. -- juippis
Description: OpenPGP digital signature