Kent Fredric wrote: > Syntax above not expected verbatim, just food for thought,
I think this is a really good and useful idea. I would love to see it. > the nature of this metadata is that it SHOULD NOT be in the ebuild > itself, as it is inherently "repo based", the installed values of > these are worthless. E.g. for auditing the installed values of these could be worth a lot. Thanks! //Peter
