On 5/11/20 2:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 14∶54 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy > napisał: >> On 5/10/20 2:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 07∶21 -0400, użytkownik Aisha >>> Tammy >>> napisał: >>>> On 5/10/20 2:02 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>>>> W dniu sob, 09.05.2020 o godzinie 22∶39 -0400, użytkownik Aisha >>>>> Tammy >>>>> napisał: >>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>> I was hoping to upgrade the dev-python/numba jit compiler >>>>>> in >>>>>> proxy- >>>>>> maint but it depends on dev-python/llvmlite >=0.31 >>>>>> Current version of llvmlite is stuck at 0.30 which is >>>>>> preventing >>>>>> the >>>>>> numba package from being upgraded. >>>>>> It is at a risk of last rite retiring because its stuck at >>>>>> 3.6 >>>>> >>>>> It is more likely to be last rited because upstream still >>>>> didn't >>>>> manage >>>>> to port it to LLVM 9. I don't have LLVM 8 anymore, and I don't >>>>> have >>>>> the resources to build 3 different LLVM versions. >>>>> >>>> The following issue tells that LLVM 9 is now supported :) >>>> https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/issues/523 >>>> >>>> They haven't updated their documentation correctly. >>> >>> I suppose this means using the fancy variable to disable LLVM >>> version >>> checks, correct? >>> >> lol, you seem to be experienced with this kind of behaviour :P . >> I won't even ask how many times this may have burned you XD . >> Indeed, they have changed the version checking feature pretty >> recently >> though nothing too coherent has been given out yet. > > Well, I've noticed it when I checked if they finally stopped requiring > 8.*. I presumed they've added it instead of proper support for LLVM 9 > but didn't expect it to actually pass tests (modulo two silly tests, > one checking version and other exact error message). > >> >> Here's to hoping they do it over summer. >> >>>> PS: regarding lack of resources. >>>> I have a spare computer and am willing to use that to do some >>>> testing >>>> for >>>> interesting packages like these. I hope it can help us keep a few >>>> more >>>> packages that would otherwise be killed off. >>> >>> Well, my hardware died two days ago, so I should have more >>> resources >>> mid-next week. Until then, only minimal work that can be done with >>> backup hardware. >>> >> That sucks, hardware failure is the bane of everyones existence T.T >> > > Well, hardware upgrade was long overdue, so there is the bright side. > My plan was to keep the old PC as backup distcc node but I guess it > wouldn't amount to much. It was Athlon64 x2 3800+ (from the times when > they still called it 'Athlon64'). > > In any case, I've just tested the version bump and will push it > shortly. Thanks! >
Oooooh, thanks a lot for your work! Aisha
