Michał Górny wrote: > > I would be happier if some other developers were able and willing to > > participate actively in the LibreSSL project. > > But why would they do that? What I'm really missing in all the replies > is a single reason why LibreSSL would be better for anyone.
Maybe because it is so well-known that monoculture is harmful per se, which is why the commitment to choice in Gentoo is very valuable. Further, LibreSSL comes out of the OpenBSD project, which has a good reputation on code quality. > a real proper, verifiable argument 'LibreSSL is better in this regard'. Choice is about enabling people to decide for themselves. Choice is /not/ about forcing people to formally prove utility to yourself. I acknowledge that what I suggest isn't immediately enabling libressl as a choice either, but it is at least far less destructive than masking and removal. //Peter
