On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 12:09:28AM +0000, Sam James wrote: > On 4 Nov 2021, at 00:02, Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 3 Nov 2021, at 23:53, Aaron Bauman <b...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Is that where the policy belongs? > >> If so, shouldn't the council update it based on their decisions? > >> "patches are welcome" doesn't fit every scenario. > > Got to agree here. If there's a gap in the documentation, > > let's file a bug -- irrespective of if someone is going to give > > a patch. > > Just commenting this on the ML means it'll get lost > > and we'll forget about it... > > Filed https://bugs.gentoo.org/821553. Please > feel free to clarify it.
Thank you! Many of us apparently have differing interpretations of the policy (and it's somewhat hidden), so a clear policy in an obvious place will be a huge improvement!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
