On 11.2.2022 1.36, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As you may have noticed, I'm practically maintaining LLVM all by myself.
> This is a really tedious, time consuming and ungrateful task, and I'm
> pretty close to burnout.  I'd really appreciate some help.
> 
> The problem with LLVM that it's a really huge, rapidly moving forward
> (and breaking things) project.  It needs frequent testing as regressions
> happen frequently, and we have a good chance of having somebody else fix
> it if we report them early.  At the same time, testing takes a lot of
> time.  While ccache is pretty much a must, it doesn't help much long
> term as the code is changing frequently and invalidating the cache.
> 
> On top of this, there's almost-overlapping release process and Gentoo
> slotting that's working so-so at best.  After I've pushed LLVM 13.0.1
> final, I've had to immediately start testing 14.x and barely managed to
> get some fixes in before rc1.  Now 14.0.0 is expected soon,
> simultaneously major changes are happening on the main branch
> (i.e. 15.x) that also need testing and adjusting the ebuilds to.

Would it help at all to not always support different _rc's and .9999s?
Or would that just bite "us" (as in Gentoo) back with a delay?

> 
> 6. Work on setting up and configuring a buildbot for Gentoo LLVM builds.
> This is some effort and I don't have the time to learn how to do that. 
> You'll probably need to set up a local instance and figure out how to
> set our builds before submitting anything upstream; in my experience
> they aren't very responsive to buildbot changes, so ideally we need to
> flesh out any problems early.

GSOC-worthy project?

> 
> Yes, that's a lot of work.  I can't do it all myself, I'm already doing
> too much and this is having negative impact on my health.  I really need
> help with this.
> 

I wonder if llvm and toolchain projects should join - not that there's
probably anyone in toolchain interested/capable of doing llvm/clang
currently. But they'd be the next with knowledge for at least simplest
version bumps if you lay back a bit. Remember this is just a hobby -
even though your work is very much appreciated, not worth of wearing
yourself out over.

-- juippis

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to