On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 07:36 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 3:04 AM Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2022-07-10 at 23:53 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > It's common for python_check_deps to call python_has_version, which
> > > calls ebegin itself.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org>
> > > ---
> > > eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass b/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass
> > > index a18ca58475f..acfa83d5e18 100644
> > > --- a/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass
> > > +++ b/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass
> > > @@ -1399,9 +1399,8 @@ _python_run_check_deps() {
> > >
> > > local PYTHON_USEDEP="python_targets_${impl}(-)"
> > > local PYTHON_SINGLE_USEDEP="python_single_target_${impl}(-)"
> > > - ebegin " python_check_deps"
> > > + einfo " python_check_deps"
> > > python_check_deps
> > > - eend ${?}
> > > }
> > >
> > > # @FUNCTION: python_has_version
> >
> > What's the harm in nesting them?
>
> It results in strange looking output, and triggers a QA warning in the
> latest version of Portage.
This change means that if python_check_deps() isn't verbose and returns
false, we have no output that it failed. At least make it print
the result verbosely then.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
