On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 21:30:49 +0500, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote: > On 2023-05-30 17:52, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > To prevent harm from Gentoo, we should reach an agreement that everyone > > can live with. To achieve a consensus, and since I can not rule out that > > I missed a post that includes specific numbers, please share your ideas > > on how EGO_SUM could be reinstated in ::gentoo by replying to this mail. > > Instate a policy to allow EGO_SUM in the gentoo tree: > > 1) from proxied maintainers
I agree that allowing EGO_SUM in ::gentoo at least for proxy maintained packages would be a good idea. I don't have any Go packages, but I can see how it could be cumbersome to get a tarball hosted somewhere. - Oskari
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
