On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 21:30:49 +0500, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote:
> On 2023-05-30 17:52, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> > To prevent harm from Gentoo, we should reach an agreement that everyone 
> > can live with. To achieve a consensus, and since I can not rule out that 
> > I missed a post that includes specific numbers, please share your ideas 
> > on how EGO_SUM could be reinstated in ::gentoo by replying to this mail.
> Instate a policy to allow EGO_SUM in the gentoo tree:
> 1) from proxied maintainers

I agree that allowing EGO_SUM in ::gentoo at least for proxy maintained
packages would be a good idea. I don't have any Go packages, but I can
see how it could be cumbersome to get a tarball hosted somewhere.

- Oskari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to