2005/9/19, Peter S. Mazinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > XFCE runs fine for me, GPE would also be an alternative (bugs.g.o has a > tarball w/ ebuilds), although it also relies on glib2. Currently I am > testing a better iconv() replacement/patch for glib2 that could solve the > glib2 dillemma, but someone will have to apply it to the tree (or we > create virtual/glib2 or glib2-uclibc (w/ PROVIDE: glib2) Is your XFCE running on top of the µclibc 0.9.27 available from Portage or your own µclibc fork?
2005/9/16, Christian Nygaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm trying to build a similar system to yours for a thinclient based on > uclibc but > I'm stuck at building Xorg, what Xserver did you choose for your project? > Have you made any internal documentations or scripts describing building? For your information, here is what X server I use: # emerge -pv xorg-x11 These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r6 +3dfx +3dnow -bitmap-fonts +cjk -debug +dlloader -dmx -doc -font-server -insecure-drivers -ipv6 +minimal +mmx (-nls) -nocxx +opengl (-pam) -sdk +sse -static +truetype-fonts -type1-fonts -xprint +xv 0 kB [1] Total size of downloads: 0 kB Portage overlays: [1] /usr/local/portage The r6 ebuild is the r5 from Portage with the patch from bug #103022 applied. As simple as this! -- [email protected] mailing list
