Can't it simply be [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? That's what the ts-7000 list is, but
that's yahoo groups ;-)
I don't mind if it's stored in a database somewhere in plain text, but i
just feel kindof violated when people can use some data-miner to read my
endless rants about how I would love to improve the current state of all
things.
hehehe...
~/Chris
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 00:36 +0200, Christopher Friedt wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know that we should all be free to write eachother and whatnot, but
for the sake of at least some net-anonymity (and certainly a decreased
amount of spam) wouldn't it be a wise suggestion to leave out domain
names of list members?
Most other lists that I belong to do not post email addresses publicly.
I don't really care for the most part, but i do happen to get some spam,
which just .... well ... sucks.
http://scriptstest.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-embedded-per-month.xml
The above site was discovered only while googling the first half of my
username, and I doubt that anyone who writes crawl-engines for data
mining purposes would _not_ think to replace [at] with @ when adding to
the list of spamming targets.
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats
Chris, That's my doing.. How would you prefer that the email addresses
be obscured? btw there are tons of other places where it's archived
plain/text.. But if you have a preferred method of obscuring then just
yell. I/we can't omit all of the domain.. So we have to use some sorta
separator.
--
[email protected] mailing list
