On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 01:57 +0200, Christopher Friedt wrote: > Can't it simply be [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? That's what the ts-7000 list is, but > that's yahoo groups ;-)
No. > I don't mind if it's stored in a database somewhere in plain text, but i > just feel kindof violated when people can use some data-miner to read my > endless rants about how I would love to improve the current state of all > things. I've changed it to use the same method as marc.theaimsgroup.com http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-embedded&m=117503494225947&w=2 Please allow 1 hour for it to be processed. > ~/Chris > > Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 00:36 +0200, Christopher Friedt wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I know that we should all be free to write eachother and whatnot, but > >> for the sake of at least some net-anonymity (and certainly a decreased > >> amount of spam) wouldn't it be a wise suggestion to leave out domain > >> names of list members? > >> > >> Most other lists that I belong to do not post email addresses publicly. > >> I don't really care for the most part, but i do happen to get some spam, > >> which just .... well ... sucks. > >> > >> http://scriptstest.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-embedded-per-month.xml > >> > >> The above site was discovered only while googling the first half of my > >> username, and I doubt that anyone who writes crawl-engines for data > >> mining purposes would _not_ think to replace [at] with @ when adding to > >> the list of spamming targets. > > > > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats > > > > Chris, That's my doing.. How would you prefer that the email addresses > > be obscured? btw there are tons of other places where it's archived > > plain/text.. But if you have a preferred method of obscuring then just > > yell. I/we can't omit all of the domain.. So we have to use some sorta > > separator. > > > > -- Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- [email protected] mailing list
