solar wrote: >http://bugs.gentoo.org (file for kang@ CC: hardened@) > > >On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 19:02 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote: > > >>Hi, >>Went on trying the latest RSBAC-1.2.5 with kernel-2.6.13. >>The kernel part went OK (except for the PaX-patch). >>Emerged rsbac-admin-1.2.5 (it's in testing ~x86) wo looking at it. >>It compiled OK, only i saw an error while looking at the passing lines. >>True, there was an error (in NSS-part) dug into autotools-jungle but >>later had a look (a diff really) between 1.2.4 <-> 1.2.5, too many >>diffs. >>Seems 1.2.5 is just being made now, but it doesn't even work (missing >>elibtoolize parts,dependency on rsbac-sources etc.) so it can't be in >>~x86. >>PS: IIRC i synced (portage) earlier today. >>Thanks.Rumen >> >> > > > Please make a bug report, yes.
Else to answer you, I do not understand what you say as: - rsbac 1.2.5 tools do not make use of auto-tools at all - rsbac 1.2.5 does not depend on rsbac-sources (it can self compile now) - rsbac-sources kernel for 1.2.5 has been uploaded at the same time (it has kernel 2.6.13 and pax btw) - rsbac 1.2.5 is not being made, it has been released. however please paste your emerge log and everything into a new bug if you still encounter a problem. refs: http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-admin-1.2.5 http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-sources-2.6.13 http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-sources-2.4.31 -- [email protected] mailing list
