On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:05:10 +0200 kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > solar wrote: > > >http://bugs.gentoo.org (file for kang@ CC: hardened@) > > > > > >On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 19:02 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote: > > > > > >>Hi, > >>Went on trying the latest RSBAC-1.2.5 with kernel-2.6.13. > >>The kernel part went OK (except for the PaX-patch). > >>Emerged rsbac-admin-1.2.5 (it's in testing ~x86) wo looking at it. > >>It compiled OK, only i saw an error while looking at the passing > >>lines. True, there was an error (in NSS-part) dug into > >>autotools-jungle but later had a look (a diff really) between 1.2.4 > >><-> 1.2.5, too many diffs. > >>Seems 1.2.5 is just being made now, but it doesn't even work > >>(missing elibtoolize parts,dependency on rsbac-sources etc.) so it > >>can't be in ~x86. > >>PS: IIRC i synced (portage) earlier today. > >>Thanks.Rumen > >> > >> > > > > > > > Please make a bug report, yes. > > Else to answer you, I do not understand what you say as: > - rsbac 1.2.5 tools do not make use of auto-tools at all > - rsbac 1.2.5 does not depend on rsbac-sources (it can self compile > now) > - rsbac-sources kernel for 1.2.5 has been uploaded at the same time > (it has kernel 2.6.13 and pax btw) > - rsbac 1.2.5 is not being made, it has been released. > > however please paste your emerge log and everything into a new bug if > you still encounter a problem. > > refs: > http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-admin-1.2.5 > http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-sources-2.6.13 > http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-sources-2.4.31 Hi, Sorry for the confusion, forgot to check for rsbac-sources in "testing" first, instead got the tarball from the site (rsbac.org) and manually tried applying the test12 PaX-patch (later saw there was such a kernel in fixed). Went along wo PaX. For about a week reading the rsbac docs, no info about rsbac-admin not depending on rsbac-sources, assume my mistake here too. The error appears while compiling NNS module in tools directory, with a libtool related error (search for GCC-3.3.5) in a "nss*.la" file. Posted only because rsbac-admin-1.2.5 compiled wo any visible error, while there was such with NSS (later saw you not using "epatch ... || die "..." in 1.2.5 ebuild). The error is in my emerge logs. IIRC i'm using GCC-3.4.4 (writing this from my non-hardened install). Thanks again. Will check all things again and file a Bug (if needed). Rumen
pgpmn9hbpILS2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
