A users perspective about vanilla-kernel, but why not just mirror whats available on kernel.org. keep it simple with the versions they offer there, with their longterm stable and slowly remove their EOL, maybe give a warning there till its gone from kernel and then make it gone from the tree.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Dale <[email protected]> wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > True, so we can keep around 3-4 older ebuilds if needed, per kernel > > release. But who really does a dependency clean these days, I've never > > done one :) So, what's the next step? Should I announce the change to > > -dev? Anyone else really object to it? Other thoughts? thanks, greg k-h > > If you are referring to --depclean, I do that pretty regular here. I > see it being recommended on -user and forums and have even seen it after > a emerge more than once. > > If you are referring to something else, disregard. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > -- > I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or > how you interpreted my words! > > >
