On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:18:12AM -0400, Douglas Dunn wrote: > A users perspective about vanilla-kernel, but why not just mirror whats > available on kernel.org. keep it simple with the versions they offer there, > with their longterm stable and slowly remove their EOL, maybe give a warning > there till its gone from kernel and then make it gone from the tree.
That's exactly what I am proposing, but keeping everything marked "unstable" as there's no time to mark them stable before the next release comes out with fixes that should be applied. thanks, greg k-h
