On 20-02-2006 13:02:49 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Sunday 19 February 2006 11:21, Grobian wrote: > > Question for now is whether we want to add these packages to some > > separate tree, either within or outside of Gentoo, or have them in the > > main tree. In the latter case, we can make a separate category > > (macos-only?) to put them in, or try to mix them in the tree (where > > would qt-mac fit? and should it require a virtual because it provides > > qt?) > First "quick step" would be to put them on gentoo-alt overlay for the first > rounds, I thought we already discussed that.
I don't really understand your (over) reaction here. But alas. > Remember the past with other devs ranting because stuff was shoved into the > tree without enough testing, or with an audience so limited that likely > nobody would use them. I don't think anyone implied that we should do that immediately. I was just asking for opinions. Not sure how I want to do it in the end. > About categories... a sys-* category is not the case... qt-mac would probably > fill into dev-libs as there's not a precise category for it (x11-libs carries > the x11 versions). True. Defenitely a better place for it. Problem remains with the package still on micro level, that it "provides" qt somehow. > P.S.: a wxMac ebuild shouldn't be difficult to prepare, either.. when I wrote > wxlib eclass I had that in mind... Might be a nice addition to the 'group'. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- [email protected] mailing list
